Pearpc mac os 9
If you buy one, deal with it.īecause hypothetically, this thing will get optimized to the point where it should be possible to run OS X acceptably.
PEARPC MAC OS 9 UPGRADE
Ever tried to upgrade a Commodore? How about an OS/390? Macs are purpose built machines, not like x86 boxes. PS - I'm not apologizing for Apple, I just think that people whine too much about this. Heck, IBM would have simply laughed at you if you bought ZOS for a machine that wouldn't run it. It was just to try and make customers happier.
PEARPC MAC OS 9 SOFTWARE
In the case of Apple, they rebated a lot of software for this sort of problem.
PEARPC MAC OS 9 PC
I understand that you want to have the new OS on the old hardware (which is typical in the PC world) but that's why there are minimum requirements. We have systems here that literally must run the same OS they shipped with. When you get stiff vertical integration, you get *stiff vertical integration*. Sure, they were about 4 years old, but that's ok, right? It's still a RS/6000! I had the worst time putting AIX 5.1 on these old RS/6000s we had laying around. But, if you get more work done on a mac, it's worth more money, and some people certainly don't seem to get as much done on windows as they do on a macintosh.
Current macintoshes are basically the same somewhat quirky, mostly reliable, and quite consistent. I bumped up the hard drive (to 2*200MB!) and the ram (to 40MB) while she had it, never even did a cache card (by the time they were cheap, she was more or less done with it) and she used pagemaker, illustrator, and photoshop throughout the system's life, and her work has won several awards in the process. She paid five grand for it when it was new (and worth eight, or at least, it sold for eight grand with a two page mono and an 8*24 display card) and she definitely got her money out of it. My mother used her Mac IIci with System 7.1 or something for absolutely ages, until just a couple of years ago in fact. Macs are workhorse machines which will not always be the fastest horse but will usually run for a long time. The biggest plus of a macintosh is that it is friendly and generally consistent in behavior. The fact that you can make it run on them with third party software that tricks the installer into going ahead and doing its job is particularly pathetic. But what's stupid is that the OS was not designed to address this issue in the hardware.Īpple's support of their own hardware is selective and short-lived at best, as evinced by the lack of support for several macs with G3 processors in OS X. Well, almost on the second count, but certainly I will forgive an error, even though Sun managed to use the same chip in several Ultra systems quite successfully. Now, I can forgive apple for having a bug and for not replacing motherboards. The cheapest software I could find to work around the problem was $80.Īnd of course, there's no firewire booting on those models, so I couldn't get around the problem that way, either.Īpple has since suppressed information about this by removing the applicable documents from the techinfo library when it was folded into their current support system.
PEARPC MAC OS 9 DRIVER
However, you need a third party disk driver to do this. There is a workaround which was considered acceptable given that these are some slow-ass macs, which is to use the PIO modes. I verified that this was the cause of my woes with an OS9 app that tests disk writing and yes indeed, I had this problem.
Unfortunately mine was not a drive which you could use and if there was any significant CPU use whatsoever it would write invalid data.
You can use slower UDMA methods on some drives, and some will do the whole shebang, up to whatever UDMA mode it supports most. Ever owned a blue and white G3 and decided to upgrade it? If it's revision 1, then you cannot use UDMA transfer modes on most hard drives, and have to resort to PIO.